{"id":4806,"date":"2015-08-31T15:50:32","date_gmt":"2015-08-31T10:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/?post_type=product&p=4806"},"modified":"2021-03-31T19:36:25","modified_gmt":"2021-03-31T14:06:25","slug":"framed-damned-acquitted-24-cases-show-how-special-cell-of-delhi-police-manufactures-terrorists","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/product\/framed-damned-acquitted-24-cases-show-how-special-cell-of-delhi-police-manufactures-terrorists\/","title":{"rendered":"Framed, Damned, Acquitted: 24 cases show how Special Cell of Delhi Police manufactures terrorists"},"content":{"rendered":"

This revised edition analyses 24 cases to show how the Special Cell of Delhi Police manufactures terror threats and terrorists.<\/em><\/p>\n

A report on “investigations” carried out by the Special Cell of Delhi Police.<\/p>\n

What judgment after judgment comments on is the manner in which the so-called evidence provided by the police and the prosecution was tampered with and fabricated, how story after story as presented by the prosecution was unreliable, incredulous, and appeared as concocted.<\/p>\n

Framed, Damed, Acquitted documents 16 cases in which those accused of being operatives of various terrorist organizations (Al Badr, HUJI, Lashkar), arrested in main by the Special Cell of Delhi Police, were acquitted by the courts, not simply for want of evidence, but because the evidence was tampered with, and the police story was found to be unreliable and incredulous. The report relies entirely on court judgements.<\/p>\n

JTSA hopes that this document will provoke a debate about the utility of these elite forces, which in the name of fighting terrorism, have been granted blanket impunity.<\/p>\n

This is a comprehensive 200-page report on cases in which people, all Muslims, were arrested, by the Delhi Police\u2019s Special Cell. The report exposes the cell which has framed people in fabricated cases with the help of concocted evidence which would later fall apart in the courts. Because, the report says, \u201cthey are backed not be evidence but by the belief that the court will be seduced by the hysteria of national security.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe document here 16 cases in which those accused of being operatives of various terrorist organizations (Al Badr, HUJI, Lashkar-e-Toiba) arrested in main by the Special Cell of Delhi Police, were acquitted by the courts, not simply for want of evidence, but because the evidence was tampered with, and the police story was found to be unreliable and incredulous,\u201d says the JTSA, which has earlier released two reports, \u2018Encounter\u2019 at Batla House: Unanswered Questions (2009) and The Case that Never Was: The \u2018SIMI \u2018 Trial of Jaipur (2012).<\/p>\n

This report is a revelation for how the \u201cspecial cells\u201d work and frame people in fake cases. There are 16 cases widely documented in the report but this is only a tip of a mountain. More such cases, without any doubt, might be lying in several other investigating agencies of India. The report has also focused on media trails in these cases- that how media reported such arrests. Presenting a person as guilty of something even before it could be proved in the court has been common in media, and often the stories published would be based on official inputs. The report exposes it all by quoting some of the media reports too.<\/p>\n

The cases documented in the JTSA report:<\/p>\n

Case 1<\/p>\n

State versusTanveerAhmad, ShakilAhmad, Ishtiaq<\/p>\n

Akhtar Dar, Md.Akhtar Dar, Md. Yusuf Lone,<\/p>\n

Abdul Rauf and GhulamMd<\/p>\n

Case 2<\/p>\n

State versus FarooqAhmed Khan, etc.<\/p>\n

Case 3<\/p>\n

State versus Md.Amir Khan<\/p>\n

Case 4<\/p>\n

State versus Khongbantbum Brojen Singh&Anr<\/p>\n

Case 5<\/p>\n

State versus Hamid Hussain, Md. Shariq,<\/p>\n

Md. IftekharAhsan Malik, Maulana Dilawar Khan,<\/p>\n

MasoodAhmed, Haroon Rashid<\/p>\n

Case 6<\/p>\n

State versus IrshadAhmed Malik<\/p>\n

Case 7<\/p>\n

State versusAyazAhmed Shah<\/p>\n

Case 8<\/p>\n

State versus Saqib Rehman, BashirAhmed Shah,<\/p>\n

NazirAhmed Sofi, Hazi Gulam Moinuddin Dar,<\/p>\n

Abdul Majid Bhat,Abdul Qayoom Khan and<\/p>\n

Birender Kumar Singh<\/p>\n

Case 9<\/p>\n

State versus KhurshidAhmad Bha!<\/p>\n

Case 10<\/p>\n

State versus Salman Khurshid Kori, and Others<\/p>\n

Case 11<\/p>\n

State versus Maurif Qamar and Md. Irshad Ali<\/p>\n

Case 12<\/p>\n

StateVersus GulzarAhmed Ganai and Md.Amin Hajam<\/p>\n

Case 13<\/p>\n

State versusTariq Dar<\/p>\n

Case 14<\/p>\n

State versus ImranAhmed&Anr.<\/p>\n

Case 15<\/p>\n

State versus Md. MukhtarAhmad Khan<\/p>\n

Case 16<\/p>\n

State versus Md. Iqbal@Abdur Rehman,<\/p>\n

Nazarul Islam&Jalaluddin<\/p>\n

Case 17<\/p>\n

State versus Md. Naushad and Others<\/p>\n

Case 18<\/p>\n

State versus Md. Hussain@Julfikar Ali@Abdul@Rahul<\/p>\n

Case 19<\/p>\n

State versus Sajjad Hussain Sheikh<\/p>\n

Case 20<\/p>\n

State versus ParvezAhmad Radoo<\/p>\n

Case 21<\/p>\n

State versus Md. Iqbal and Mushtaq Ahmad Kallo<\/p>\n

Case 22<\/p>\n

State versus Md.AmeenWani alias Khalid and<\/p>\n

Luthfur Rahman alias Haroon<\/p>\n

Case 23<\/p>\n

State versus Md. Hassan, Shafaqat Iqbal and<\/p>\n

Shabbir Ahmed<\/p>\n

Case 24<\/p>\n

State versus Javed Ahmad Tantrey<\/p>\n

@Sikandar and AshiqAli Bu!<\/p>\n

Demands<\/p>\n

Appendix 1<\/p>\n

Irshad\u2019s Letter toPM<\/p>\n

Appendix 2<\/p>\n

ParvezAhmed Radoo’s Letter from Tihar Jail<\/p>\n

Appendix 3<\/p>\n

Anoverview of the cases<\/p>\n

Appendix 4 299<\/p>\n

Glossary of Criminal Offences:<\/p>\n

[Year of Arrest]<\/p>\n

1992 Tanveer Ahmed, Shakil Ahmed, Ishtiaq Akhtar Dar, Mohd Akhtar Dar and<\/p>\n

others. Years in jail 10.<\/p>\n

1996 Farooq Ahmed Khan, others. Years in jail 4.<\/p>\n

1997 Mohd Amir Khan. Years in jail 14.<\/p>\n

2002 Khongbantbum Brojen Singh. Years in jail 7.<\/p>\n

2004 Mohd Iftekar Ahsan Malik, Maulana Dilawar Khan and others. Years in jail 6.<\/p>\n

2004 Irshad Ahmed Malik. Years in jail 6.<\/p>\n

2004 Ayaz Ahmed Shah. Years in jail 5.<\/p>\n

2005 Saqib Rehman, Bashir Ahmed Shah, Nazir Ahmed Sofi and others. Years in jail 6.<\/p>\n

2005 Khurshid Ahmad Bhatt. Years in jail 6.<\/p>\n

2006 Salman Khurshid Kori. Years in jail 5.<\/p>\n

2006 Maurif Qamar and Mohd Irshad Ali. Years in jail 5.<\/p>\n

2006 Gulzar Ganai, Mohd Amin Hajam. Years in jail 3.<\/p>\n

2006 Tariq Dar. 3 months in jail.<\/p>\n

2006 Imran Ahmed. Years in jail 5.<\/p>\n

2007 Mohd Mukhtar Ahmed Khan. Years in jail 5.<\/p>\n

2008 Mohd Iqbal alias Abdur Rehman. Years in jail 3.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This revised edition analyses 24 cases to show how the Special Cell of Delhi Police manufactures terror threats and terrorists.<\/p>\n

A report on “investigations” carried out by the Special Cell of Delhi Police.<\/p>\n

By Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Association (JTSA)<\/p>\n

303 pages p\/b
\nYear: 2015 (Second Edition)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":4868,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"product_cat":[20,40,182,9,181,174],"product_tag":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/4806"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4806"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4868"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=4806"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pharosmedia.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=4806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}